From: "Jonathan" Received: from mtaout006-public.msg.strl.va.charter.net ([68.114.190.31] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTP id 7175921 for ae-list@media-motion.tv; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 22:17:16 +0200 Received: from impout005 ([68.114.189.20]) by mtaout006.msg.strl.va.charter.net (InterMail vM.9.00.023.01 201-2473-194) with ESMTP id <20181018202907.TTAK7358.mtaout006.msg.strl.va.charter.net@impout005> for ; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:29:07 -0500 Received: from [10.0.1.10] ([66.215.92.203]) by impout005 with charter.net id p8V61y00E4PFeh6018V6zx; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:29:07 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Ts+WvHfh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4PBmsvhb/PU6N22wr2wWDA==:117 a=4PBmsvhb/PU6N22wr2wWDA==:17 a=clk0PUG-DM4Ng9xd7cIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=N4RtxdUE0BfYf39i:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6442A480-FC2A-4651-B3D2-F03E324F91ED" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Uservoice feedback website - Top post - Full Program. Mutli-Threaded Support Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:29:06 -0700 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18) --Apple-Mail=_6442A480-FC2A-4651-B3D2-F03E324F91ED Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Um . . . I don=E2=80=99t get it. If RenderGarden can do it =E2=80=93 and = I=E2=80=99m a devoted fan =E2=80=93 why can=E2=80=99t Adobe? So perhaps = it=E2=80=99s not integrated as well as one might like, but you don=E2=80=99= t have to leave AE to use it and the result is seamless. It runs in the = background, uses as many cores as you like, can work across machines, = and can save huge amounts of time. What am I missing? Jonathan Penzner Sundance/Realtime > On Oct 18, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Gordon Mah = wrote: >=20 > Part of the rationale for going to a subscription model was that it = would loosen the rules publicly traded companies need to adhere to. You = can=E2=80=99t use that excuse any more, Adobe. >=20 > Break plugins? We can run a previous version in parallel, no? Sure = multi-threaded is tough, but I=E2=80=99d venture that 32-to-64 bit was = tougher. I=E2=80=99d gladly wait 2 yrs w/out new features if we knew = major core updates were coming. --Apple-Mail=_6442A480-FC2A-4651-B3D2-F03E324F91ED Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Um . . . I don=E2=80=99t get it. If RenderGarden can do it = =E2=80=93 and I=E2=80=99m a devoted fan =E2=80=93 why can=E2=80=99t = Adobe? So perhaps it=E2=80=99s not integrated as well as one might like, = but you don=E2=80=99t have to leave AE to use it and the result is = seamless. It runs in the background, uses as many cores as you like, can = work across machines, and can save huge amounts of time.

What am I = missing?


Jonathan Penzner
Sundance/Realtime


On Oct = 18, 2018, at 1:11 PM, Gordon Mah <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Part of the rationale for going to a = subscription model was that it would loosen the rules publicly traded = companies need to adhere to.  You can=E2=80=99t use that excuse any = more, Adobe.

Break = plugins?  We can run a previous version in parallel, no?  Sure = multi-threaded is tough, but I=E2=80=99d venture that 32-to-64 bit was = tougher.  I=E2=80=99d gladly wait 2 yrs w/out new features if we = knew major core updates were = coming.
= --Apple-Mail=_6442A480-FC2A-4651-B3D2-F03E324F91ED--