From: "Timothy Sassoon" Received: from mail-pl1-f179.google.com ([209.85.214.179] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7196844 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 02:54:32 +0100 Received: by mail-pl1-f179.google.com with SMTP id x21-v6so13074851pln.9 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:07:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=rzPP48pTPXh1PwvFlLs/kiASWDd9ovvh6IRiBd0fec8=; b=G3mIJMmibwN6RDbChaUbLUxDKRynF0Gc8l2xT9nYCfq7B0jzlBzin5LXIQHqeixlm5 br+D+IGC6UnBzmo9bLaCzQLlQgCdfCK49NjWOzr7vRBuE6LGXxcORNDyB8WRDqKaSD+m qiGfUzAtaZhROuCGGmUdDtwMDE0eRiinnAH2e1hpYKXp0seKuuc4PX0fTpNsPHLsEXmw ggJrPtqOrfNVoWbgFffSb2xN5Am7yzlj1gVUNc7CjjaMWNJUg78m84FnYGxjaFcT8/Bp uvHlnw2luFiHUmR+nxXu8LzUNv4sbG7sJJIViKs5p+2X141njaoZn43vZV2lC5yiQPm1 a6+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=rzPP48pTPXh1PwvFlLs/kiASWDd9ovvh6IRiBd0fec8=; b=QE/VRE1fyaJa4UJHWWuahF2QlqOtZ6Rhx5QKXxe6SizVPGQdUyA9s+ypdPNFK/OZ8d Qxi70yYYj+WVIrTjp1JbtaLYgdrK7ksIFMN0M3V5a+XlnDVAKaz2mIbHELl/mUjj7y2h 71V+UWVeLJ9s3bhZ6VUtg71OwhJQyXGfGLk7omy6o6I+0mtMyurYAYc3ZNcXfkcJcTMb FTtx5yGDTi2RxAbTb5exJ1MefNe+HhxAZWVjEJWvpF7c38qxtTjFbukU0TyWx2IYLYyz fUfH2hwqQupYy5ooFrVtIhqRURfxyThnqFo2dWGNNYVnrgoFRmlpa+UbOQ0EfTbliDxC oSKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZSucJ0BqcoUwpEOGc2cx8+Xb1fci91rXrwnfeOdR+MD9A2ZaDx K616iTMTOT2ZvuPES9yLZyGGBdeK X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WNsHPIEY7xXaS4N8XbjNXw3feqVw34FUOx/YkW0NdFoMQx7Fas4n2h6ivwR56sT3r+V72mxg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:24d:: with SMTP id 71mr24856816plc.225.1543198060911; Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:07:40 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from ?IPv6:2605:e000:1520:4bb:652f:1213:6533:b82a? ([2605:e000:1520:4bb:652f:1213:6533:b82a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t62sm67760934pgb.39.2018.11.25.18.07.39 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:07:39 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_21363696-A0D8-4840-9B7C-5616D8C05D84" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: [AE] CC2018 Adjustment Layers not rendering? Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 18:07:38 -0800 References: To: AE List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) --Apple-Mail=_21363696-A0D8-4840-9B7C-5616D8C05D84 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 That wouldn=E2=80=99t help much, because it was just positional offsets = in the Transform effect. I just restarted the MBP (OSX 10.13) and that = _seems_ to have cured the problem - its previews correctly now. But of = course begs others - how would even a partially crashed system affect = individual layers in an AE comp? Tim > On Nov 25, 2018, at 5:50 PM, scott.aelist = wrote: >=20 > Would be helpful to see a screenshot. If you add additional effects to = the Adjustment layer do they also not render? eg. fill, blur etc. >=20 > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 5:45 PM Tim Sassoon > wrote: > Good tip to check, but no 3D layers. Thanks! >=20 > Tim >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Nov 25, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Victoria Nece > wrote: >>=20 >> If the layer's 3D, check if you've switched to the C4D renderer.=20 >>=20 >> On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 8:06 PM Tim Sassoon > wrote: >>=20 >> Trying to figure out why an adjustment layer with a transform effect = isn=E2=80=99t rendering in the next comp. And no, it isn=E2=80=99t set = to be a Guide Layer. Any ideas? It previews fine in the first comp. GPU = rendering off. >>=20 >> I=E2=80=99ve had some other things not render with GPU on recently, = so I=E2=80=99m wondering if it=E2=80=99s a bug. >>=20 >>=20 >> Tim >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to > >=20 --Apple-Mail=_21363696-A0D8-4840-9B7C-5616D8C05D84 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 That = wouldn=E2=80=99t help much, because it was just positional offsets in = the Transform effect. I just restarted the MBP (OSX 10.13) and that = _seems_ to have cured the problem - its previews correctly now. But of = course begs others - how would even a partially crashed system affect = individual layers in an AE comp?


Tim



On Nov = 25, 2018, at 5:50 PM, scott.aelist <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Would be helpful to see a screenshot. If you add additional = effects to the Adjustment layer do they also not render? eg. fill, blur = etc.

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 5:45 PM Tim Sassoon <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
Good tip to check, but no 3D layers. Thanks!
Tim



On Nov 25, 2018, at 5:38 PM, Victoria Nece <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

If the layer's 3D, check if = you've switched to the C4D renderer. 

On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 = at 8:06 PM Tim Sassoon <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Trying to figure out why an adjustment layer with a transform effect = isn=E2=80=99t rendering in the next comp. And no, it isn=E2=80=99t set = to be a Guide Layer. Any ideas? It previews fine in the first comp. GPU = rendering off.

I=E2=80=99ve had some other things not render with GPU on recently, so = I=E2=80=99m wondering if it=E2=80=99s a bug.


Tim



+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>


= --Apple-Mail=_21363696-A0D8-4840-9B7C-5616D8C05D84--