From: "George Loch" Received: from [184.154.208.36] (HELO delivery.mailspamprotection.com) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7247886 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 02:25:14 +0100 Received: from ns1.us183.siteground.us ([77.104.151.162] helo=us183.siteground.us) by se6.mailspamprotection.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gwdHC-00078X-4C for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:35:51 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=motoxpress.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=MQDDH0huygOrJI4t7kNPVrFs9iAOEXwrtiSD/m/MPaQ=; b=v0Hd71NC7ZmYmsoafQ+ekYRIJ 67oNq7Z3q8C8s4O10hppU4D9XlC5I8r+27cTW2tzF8ekR2ybHSihATO61nknL4LIqI3pAnK8cD6gL 5CtRvnX+0XlwHIa57vIkKpktN+6D8pY2qTKs3kAISZofDbj2pfX3ymydmk4oSej1tvihwBcJkBeg+ 6xqWvUlYS+eB7nJKQ6tgBEf2VxsDD6C08FfOI93n7uPiviL3x6VI5qDqcsJQUgaf/Ev3bea01paKn SWiI70dxnQfKPj41v62OOCK5dKItpCbwvMKKoEpVkq7H5MPNCAbW/ngCeFDRJiB628atFHmwWeW8P vnerYvHTA==; Received: from [209.85.221.53] (port=40543 helo=mail-wr1-f53.google.com) by us183.siteground.us with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_34-9f6032f-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1gwdHB-000CZn-R7 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 19:35:49 -0600 Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id q1so28140441wrp.7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:35:48 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaI64M6lSWPs9vWSJ91GwSE/zDDqCmxHVMElSa2fNeYmAAQsVGx v63X6BDH0dZRI4xw3OuvUxbxI36rzTVdXolIdIs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYeqXvsHWnHP6fix3aZymCJl+8uCQ9P4vxtHy20zF/kx7QTMeG18u0TO2PqBVpwcAmv9/Q9vcQPnwIPBOSpXT4= X-Received: by 2002:adf:9dc4:: with SMTP id q4mr11332053wre.330.1550712948042; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:35:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 18:35:37 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Dynamic Link Best Practice To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ab31505825d7eea" X-Originating-IP: 77.104.151.162 X-SpamExperts-Domain: us183.siteground.us X-SpamExperts-Username: 77.104.151.162 Authentication-Results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=77.104.151.162@us183.siteground.us X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.39) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5s/tztpiKpbwiMvQ4EOKbpJ602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx q3u0UDjvO5EH6bxlj25ebuXlztbLqBSFEXwfg5Cduc2AR1p3+xwEvpf3JjS9poTbC9IODXxixq3c K5igY+smPSTI1es5tU9y0vKNdJMHZ2K0qgciRU0q2aftXMLd6NhqBOyUYmTdIy7/+fOTvqVqTiiM 4NskccRhXEcrC8rBoEP280Rdqgka7KNuqYnO1kk+wziobWmUqgqvIbyuaoL04EgbPn1m7N/1wJNm k2OOvqxJC+I78JUyACQHwPTDFXEPVlYw9avkW1cOSsXgJVtQoc6nSTSCS1pTLhyO+Yppsxtwr52o SsPLXvDuFGkOuRGwqhSPI4i0mE7ORMeWjWZXIFUBbQIaxIo93SsS4aMXJmiJ2G0eb5ahlbDFGdMZ ORWs51tC2DIbMynb08gY7Z9WGbWn9uGQ9nE7ewl4g2tpBYo5PepVWtf5e3KKC/am0SSdnvIEkFKi CUWk9qjCPHj1p0MEjRB6kxXL1dQzbDGk/AKdxeY/WW00MEUjirlxDlGq5t0ERVtkfLG7nYXUxl35 7jpGVViM9qRV63sE0sRb9cgJa2195tpp+/YTAUzIKEDhdJQDEmx2Lcn+N89forJ5kqTn7qACixoU Tl29owGPWhNjOyIyCr9C8KGvTUYYbK2rpHOCrqJlXWz3SjEP9NfI4xLcVWbgJc9958ZBZEzbioNb F9V1LVaiGNM3WP/z6gF+Ue700vz0FH82um+IFYiClkWCvc18MskRFZ4oobg8BBg3Jq+ntzj0EtLM xsAsO7WB+diLd3Lumxca/+D9lOiup6f7yzmQuXqe7fw2CkLPb98LP8HE1JOoUCBwuWZDqdcXVcPJ 1qWTzmbjO41FyBEqIaDudcVplPHVGuJvafMJ+mdiugPZd7Dt3BKhnLKZG32DFCyzmHXmXiLClsJx u8zNTb+YP1uCXUSlBrOcO44uGsJrglJ8IiCO3jR5NeVaJQBh0uawl0Cg8gXe1vK8XGdMTMs9jTIF FMMEOg9J0rb89zLviKNmeXxp4KYG8MeZdETnC9mqKoRz09DuQFy7B04BctTnMP8o8NTaBH6j0M4V 9qyQKZLz6wYd X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.mailspamprotection.com --0000000000006ab31505825d7eea Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The integration is better on later versions (Although I have recently discovered a bug in 2018). As to rendering speed, Premiere will render much faster if AE is closed. Not sure if you have discovered that quick win :) -gl On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Mercado wrote: > I=E2=80=99m sure this topic has been addressed once or twice before, but = in light > of the great Optimized System post that was up recently I wondered if the= re > were any best practices for getting the most out of DL > > I=E2=80=99m still using CC2014 for PP and AE - not tried the most recent = versions, > but hated all the prior versions so I=E2=80=99ve stuck to what I like and= what > works (I=E2=80=99m just stoked to be paying monthly for 5 year old softwa= re, but > that=E2=80=99s another rant). And my experience in CC14 with DL is horrib= le. What > takes 10 mins in AE to render, takes an hour to Preview in PP. > > So two things, is DL one of the features that got improved with later > editions? I=E2=80=99ll trade off the other negatives to get better DL per= formance > if it comes down to that. Also, are there system or settings optimization= =E2=80=99s > that can be done to improve DL performance. > > Thanks > > Adam Mercado > Owner & Creative Idiot > Influxx Media Production > 714.928.9896 > > Moving Images. For Business > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > --0000000000006ab31505825d7eea Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The integration is better on later versions (Although I ha= ve recently discovered a bug in 2018).=C2=A0

As to rende= ring speed, Premiere will render much faster if AE is closed. Not sure if y= ou have discovered that quick win :)

-gl

On W= ed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Mercado <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
I=E2=80=99m sure this topic has been ad= dressed once or twice before, but in light of the great Optimized System po= st that was up recently I wondered if there were any best practices for get= ting the most out of DL

I=E2=80=99m still using CC2014 for PP and AE - not tried the most recent ve= rsions, but hated all the prior versions so I=E2=80=99ve stuck to what I li= ke and what works (I=E2=80=99m just stoked to be paying monthly for 5 year = old software, but that=E2=80=99s another rant). And my experience in CC14 w= ith DL is horrible. What takes 10 mins in AE to render, takes an hour to Pr= eview in PP.

So two things, is DL one of the features that got improved with later editi= ons? I=E2=80=99ll trade off the other negatives to get better DL performanc= e if it comes down to that. Also, are there system or settings optimization= =E2=80=99s that can be done to improve DL performance.

Thanks

Adam Mercado
Owner & Creative Idiot
Influxx Media Production
714.928.9896

Moving Images. For Business

+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
--0000000000006ab31505825d7eea--