From: "Adam Mercado" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary=Apple-Mail-163CB165-3856-4505-BE38-18749C26F85F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:55:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [AE] Dynamic Link Best Practice
Message-Id: <D812A8B0-DDC6-4AA5-89C1-9D950F6D83A5@influxx.com>
References: <list-7247887@media-motion.tv>
In-Reply-To: <list-7247887@media-motion.tv>
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>


--Apple-Mail-163CB165-3856-4505-BE38-18749C26F85F
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks George. In what ways is DL better integrated? It=E2=80=99s really onl=
y speed I=E2=80=99m bothered by, although some blending mode stuff could car=
ry over from AE to PP I suppose.=20

I did not know about PP rendering faster with AE open. I always margined it m=
ight be the opposite for some reason. Go figure. I=E2=80=99ll try and compar=
e.=20

Also, is AME any faster for PP renders than just a basic Export? I can=E2=80=
=99t remember if I read that AME was multi threaded and at what version that=
 happened

Adam Mercado


> On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:35 PM, George Loch <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
>=20
> The integration is better on later versions (Although I have recently disc=
overed a bug in 2018).=20
>=20
> As to rendering speed, Premiere will render much faster if AE is closed. N=
ot sure if you have discovered that quick win :)
>=20
> -gl
>=20
>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Mercado <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wr=
ote:
>> I=E2=80=99m sure this topic has been addressed once or twice before, but i=
n light of the great Optimized System post that was up recently I wondered i=
f there were any best practices for getting the most out of DL
>>=20
>> I=E2=80=99m still using CC2014 for PP and AE - not tried the most recent v=
ersions, but hated all the prior versions so I=E2=80=99ve stuck to what I li=
ke and what works (I=E2=80=99m just stoked to be paying monthly for 5 year o=
ld software, but that=E2=80=99s another rant). And my experience in CC14 wit=
h DL is horrible. What takes 10 mins in AE to render, takes an hour to Previ=
ew in PP.=20
>>=20
>> So two things, is DL one of the features that got improved with later edi=
tions? I=E2=80=99ll trade off the other negatives to get better DL performan=
ce if it comes down to that. Also, are there system or settings optimization=
=E2=80=99s that can be done to improve DL performance.
>>=20
>> Thanks
>>=20
>> Adam Mercado
>> Owner & Creative Idiot
>> Influxx Media Production=20
>> 714.928.9896
>>=20
>> Moving Images. For Business
>>=20
>> +---End of message---+
>> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>

--Apple-Mail-163CB165-3856-4505-BE38-18749C26F85F
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3D=
utf-8"></head><body dir=3D"auto">Thanks George. In what ways is DL better in=
tegrated? It=E2=80=99s really only speed I=E2=80=99m bothered by, although s=
ome blending mode stuff could carry over from AE to PP I suppose.&nbsp;<div>=
<br></div><div>I did not know about PP rendering faster with AE open. I alwa=
ys margined it might be the opposite for some reason. Go figure. I=E2=80=99l=
l try and compare.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div><div>Also, is AME any faster fo=
r PP renders than just a basic Export? I can=E2=80=99t remember if I read th=
at AME was multi threaded and at what version that happened<br><br><div><div=
><span style=3D"background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);">Adam Mercado</spa=
n></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div><div><br>On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:3=
5 PM, George Loch &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:AE-List@media-motion.tv">AE-List@med=
ia-motion.tv</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div><div=
 dir=3D"ltr">The integration is better on later versions (Although I have re=
cently discovered a bug in 2018).&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>As to rendering s=
peed, Premiere will render much faster if AE is closed. Not sure if you have=
 discovered that quick win :)</div><div><br></div><div>-gl</div></div><br><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Wed, Feb 2=
0, 2019 at 1:01 PM Adam Mercado &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:AE-List@media-motion.t=
v">AE-List@media-motion.tv</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204=
,204);padding-left:1ex">I=E2=80=99m sure this topic has been addressed once o=
r twice before, but in light of the great Optimized System post that was up r=
ecently I wondered if there were any best practices for getting the most out=
 of DL<br>
<br>
I=E2=80=99m still using CC2014 for PP and AE - not tried the most recent ver=
sions, but hated all the prior versions so I=E2=80=99ve stuck to what I like=
 and what works (I=E2=80=99m just stoked to be paying monthly for 5 year old=
 software, but that=E2=80=99s another rant). And my experience in CC14 with D=
L is horrible. What takes 10 mins in AE to render, takes an hour to Preview i=
n PP. <br>
<br>
So two things, is DL one of the features that got improved with later editio=
ns? I=E2=80=99ll trade off the other negatives to get better DL performance i=
f it comes down to that. Also, are there system or settings optimization=E2=80=
=99s that can be done to improve DL performance.<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Adam Mercado<br>
Owner &amp; Creative Idiot<br>
Influxx Media Production <br>
714.928.9896<br>
<br>
Moving Images. For Business<br>
<br>
+---End of message---+<br>
To unsubscribe send any message to &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-m=
otion.tv" target=3D"_blank">ae-list-off@media-motion.tv</a>&gt;<br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail-163CB165-3856-4505-BE38-18749C26F85F--