From: "George Loch" Received: from delivery.mailspamprotection.com ([96.127.190.3] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7248545 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:57:21 +0100 Received: from ns1.us183.siteground.us ([77.104.151.162] helo=us183.siteground.us) by se1.mailspamprotection.com with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gxEIo-000ADI-Px for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:08:02 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=motoxpress.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tFut32+DDcqQ0cZNZ7vE8fgas7Vk7+la72Y43SXKB34=; b=I14G69CwM5+/3EXSEYVViIMp4 sLps8UugeqaOVq62IGSirlA157YFP4t+LjqJognrK1C3VBGHfOe45hfbr7mRqfLKZHVKKzqKHsfHB mq5tNusNRYaqT5VRuMAV+YIj5jAhNzDQ8HlEWg38eHJwMIP2TH9mDmgv+esf9pRuU9+NZs0+46KY8 80ZlCSsKi9l94BcB3qrOT6joHZC7afUDDxaK+rZZHJjJH4WwsYUcNKK88EMZHvhsJjKEwKfiP0Wd5 oHPTo/bQL7ya9cZ9OSrMRirIIu09ujnMV0RkKtPPWLB5MVQRfRK8KlgBEojaflvT6qgT3JehesI0K 5zAMoOimA==; Received: from [209.85.128.51] (port=53366 helo=mail-wm1-f51.google.com) by us183.siteground.us with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89_34-9f6032f-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1gxEIo-0004KM-Et for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 11:07:58 -0600 Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id e74so2600908wmg.3 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:07:58 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYvNI4DNhthBddhn+ZhyDycaXGaGCllXLMY+As3MS2VWc2yea+S RdvNjCGRArTLfPq4MwZZ1fWrUKIVrbhilgjtevg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbcbPN8Ah7t09ILa5/TpnKX2iHfOwI3WmFmyjITwDxgmGcn4skRftAW2gIXjgNJx1gd9rcgpTl6p2YTId88Eng= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7eca:: with SMTP id z193mr3405497wmc.140.1550855277462; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:07:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 10:07:46 -0700 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Dynamic Link Best Practice To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e94c4005827ea1f4" X-Originating-IP: 77.104.151.162 X-SpamExperts-Domain: us183.siteground.us X-SpamExperts-Username: 77.104.151.162 Authentication-Results: mailspamprotection.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=77.104.151.162@us183.siteground.us X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Class: unsure X-SpamExperts-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.34) X-Recommended-Action: accept X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5lRblQh/FEHdA5l4gMDeymd602E9L7XzfQH6nu9C/Fh9KJzpNe6xgvOx q3u0UDjvO5EH6bxlj25ebuXlztbLqBSFEXwfg5Cduc2AR1p3+xwEvpf3JjS9poTbC9IODXxixo7T w6UeYhRiWrRJkXY2QCBy0vKNdJMHZ2K0qgciRU0q0VPtV+f/q5EZPLkzhsa4yC7/+fOTvqVqTiiM 4NskccRhXEcrC8rBoEP280Rdqgka7KNuqYnO1kk+wziobWmUqgqvIbyuaoL04EgbPn1m7N/1wJNm k2OOvqxJC+I78JUyACQHwPTDFXEPVlYw9avkW1cOSsXgJVtQoc6nSTSCS1pTLhyO+Yppsxtwr52o SsPLXvDuFGkOuRGwqhSPI4i0mE7ORMeWjWZXIFUBbQIaxIo93SsS4aMXJmiJ2G0eb5ahlbDFGdMZ ORWs51tC2DIbMynb08gY7Z9WGbWn9uGQ9nE7ewl4g2tpBYo5PepVWtf5e3KKC/am0SSdnvIEkFKi CUWk9qjCPHj1p0MEjRB6kxXL1dQzbDGk/AKdxeY/WW00rnkbqg5/nKUmhMSlB2xbDIO3c6+HsvDY 1N25v6ugLMIWIR8MbxN/fCltqFfVb0a3HeLrMJk3RWPftFyCF9ezZb3oiurCgxUcR8ywwarnEDwP 0Hs0Qg0APU3EOU8zZkf5eJRbKKn0b83shNW2MpUkvTJrpLtRWcfHP9UinIhWJyF6sc7REPQaPjyd lUks4voMLjgP0WmKerGIundkwej4sx51whzuTo9lNN4XwcRdDc2rA+IbvtGUHWiqXOw3sojkkNuI pvO0byIHb4bhKC3NT1rQ4b8SRNLWrtQ/OTzkXPsYQcNEHu34ZJHISvnDg4rjYa8uOGrb0IzsR0GQ nRfK+FFfEoXm0/FPF8PR0w363lmDrgowrmYYm90KrhU2w+S7gH9Qj80TvGlgMbXy3u2h8eyEc6VG ihosgoN2ebcImv78BAfb6hXoeiPbGnEJ3Y+ZY9Pmbg52pYx0TRvgmjPTz1fRAiMiMKfXO9C5TEIH Dglfx8BCdqpG015fxwvlhYt6nIMjckiI/xJKO95eRFqwOsx94+Igmw1FnIqiWm/sBjT/XaXwwHI6 pnRoNB0arC8d X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine1.mailspamprotection.com --000000000000e94c4005827ea1f4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Two things: For me, 2018 has been the most stable for CC video apps. I think it's better than 2017 was. Secondly... Teddy, Master Properties <- how did I not know about this? Mind blown! -gl On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 9:57 AM Adam Mercado wrote: > Jim, are you saying RenderGarden speeds up DL use? I=E2=80=99m not sure I= follow > your thought on that. Also, is CC18 pretty stable/useable/efficient > regarding DL use in your experience. If it=E2=80=99s been broken in CC19 = then I=E2=80=99ll > steer clear but maybe I=E2=80=99ll give CC18 another look if you reckon i= t=E2=80=99s worth > it > > > > Adam Mercado > Owner & Creative Idiot > Influxx Media Production > 714.928.9896 > > Moving Images. For Business > > > On Feb 22, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Jim Curtis wrote= : > > > > I also use DL the way you describe here for my render-intensive Ae > Comps, and for those I use RenderGarden, which renders about 4-6x faster > than Ae alone, in my experience. > > > > But, for the most part for name supers and simple (fast rendering) GFX > in Pr, I=E2=80=99ve come to depend on DL, which has gotten less stable wi= th CC19, > in my experience. So much so that I=E2=80=99m sticking with CC18 for lar= ge > projects, and clients who give me lots of projects, and CC19 for one-offs > from =E2=80=9Cseldom=E2=80=9D clients. A Pr Project downgrader I found o= n the web has > become invaluable, after I run into road blocks in Pr CC 19. > > > > If I=E2=80=99m going to need a lot of Mocha, I=E2=80=99ll do those in A= e CC19, and > render out to import into Pr CC18. > > > > Teddy, you=E2=80=99re the first =E2=80=9Cadvanced user=E2=80=9D I=E2=80= =99ve noticed who uses Essential > Graphics. I inherited a project from a beginner, all of whose graphics > were VideoHive templates. The Text Tool in Pr will continue to suck as > long as they keep that ridiculous method of kerning that takes forever. = I > don=E2=80=99t know why Adobe can=E2=80=99t make their Type tools consiste= nt between all > their apps. > > > > > > > > > >> On Feb 22, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Teddy Gage > wrote: > >> > >> Adam, clearly I will not get you to change your ways, but as you said, > paying $50 / month for 5 year old software is nuts. Nothing says you have > to abandon 2014, but I literally could not imagine working in it > completely, with all the advancements and improvements and bug fixes sinc= e > then. I can't even list them there are so many. I know it's trendy to hat= e > on AE development since 2014 but many many features that have come down t= he > pipe have increased my productivity 10x. GPU accelerated effects and mast= er > properties alone are indispensable to my workflow now. Versioning lower > thirds now takes minutes vs. hours. DL is much more stable than it used t= o > be, and much faster. But I guess if you're also on 5+ year old hardware, > maybe you may not notice much difference. > >> > >> Anyway - > >> > >> I still don't use DL quite as intended - I use it to create the initia= l > comp to the appropriate length in AE, and bring in assets. Then I disable > the DL in premiere, render out from AE and bring the clip back into > Premiere. Rendering through Premiere with the AE engine is incredibly slo= w, > even with the "hack" of closing AE. If the clip is pre-rendered you're > gonna save a ton of time. And native rendering in AE is much faster than > through any external app (AME or pp). > >> > > > > > > +---End of message---+ > > To unsubscribe send any message to > > > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > --000000000000e94c4005827ea1f4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Two things:

For me, 2018 has been the m= ost stable for CC video apps. I think it's better than 2017 was.
<= div>
Secondly... Teddy, Master Properties <- how did I not= know about this? Mind blown!

-gl

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Fri, Feb= 22, 2019 at 9:57 AM Adam Mercado <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
Jim, are you saying RenderGarden speeds up DL = use? I=E2=80=99m not sure I follow your thought on that. Also, is CC18 pret= ty stable/useable/efficient regarding DL use in your experience. If it=E2= =80=99s been broken in CC19 then I=E2=80=99ll steer clear but maybe I=E2=80= =99ll give CC18 another look if you reckon it=E2=80=99s worth it



Adam Mercado
Owner & Creative Idiot
Influxx Media Production
714.928.9896

Moving Images. For Business

> On Feb 22, 2019, at 7:58 AM, Jim Curtis <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote: >
> I also use DL the way you describe here for my render-intensive Ae Com= ps, and for those I use RenderGarden, which renders about 4-6x faster than = Ae alone, in my experience.
>
> But, for the most part for name supers and simple (fast rendering) GFX= in Pr, I=E2=80=99ve come to depend on DL, which has gotten less stable wit= h CC19, in my experience.=C2=A0 So much so that I=E2=80=99m sticking with C= C18 for large projects, and clients who give me lots of projects, and CC19 = for one-offs from =E2=80=9Cseldom=E2=80=9D clients.=C2=A0 A Pr Project down= grader I found on the web has become invaluable, after I run into road bloc= ks in Pr CC 19.
>
> If I=E2=80=99m going to need a lot of Mocha, I=E2=80=99ll do those in = Ae CC19, and render out to import into Pr CC18.
>
> Teddy, you=E2=80=99re the first =E2=80=9Cadvanced user=E2=80=9D I=E2= =80=99ve noticed who uses Essential Graphics.=C2=A0 I inherited a project f= rom a beginner, all of whose graphics were VideoHive templates.=C2=A0 The T= ext Tool in Pr will continue to suck as long as they keep that ridiculous m= ethod of kerning that takes forever.=C2=A0 I don=E2=80=99t know why Adobe c= an=E2=80=99t make their Type tools consistent between all their apps.
>
>
>
>
>> On Feb 22, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Teddy Gage <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrot= e:
>>
>> Adam, clearly I will not get you to change your ways, but as you s= aid, paying $50 / month for 5 year old software is nuts. Nothing says you h= ave to abandon 2014, but I literally could not imagine working in it comple= tely, with all the advancements and improvements and bug fixes since then. = I can't even list them there are so many. I know it's trendy to hat= e on AE development since 2014 but many many features that have come down t= he pipe have increased my productivity 10x. GPU accelerated effects and mas= ter properties alone are indispensable to my workflow now. Versioning lower= thirds now takes minutes vs. hours. DL is much more stable than it used to= be, and much faster. But I guess if you're also on 5+ year old hardwar= e, maybe you may not notice much difference.
>>
>> Anyway -
>>
>> I still don't use DL quite as intended - I use it to create th= e initial comp to the appropriate length in AE, and bring in assets. Then I= disable the DL in premiere, render out from AE and bring the clip back int= o Premiere. Rendering through Premiere with the AE engine is incredibly slo= w, even with the "hack" of closing AE. If the clip is pre-rendere= d you're gonna save a ton of time. And native rendering in AE is much f= aster than through any external app (AME or pp).
>>
>
>
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
--000000000000e94c4005827ea1f4--