From: "Phil Spitler" Received: from mail-pg1-f181.google.com ([209.85.215.181] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7440417 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:51:13 +0200 Received: by mail-pg1-f181.google.com with SMTP id o10so269805pgs.6 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:54:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bonfirelabs-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=AlT0ghwcn8Hvf1ec07WcTUqn20TXd95Ai3B96QacZPY=; b=oXdPalyi4w5P2pzx/pl76P+R3YLB5bdtm3Y1hx7j/H3028+8jqPjHgH0I6dOZo8c7m GSaK9OIRkWN0UE9SJPDhLCrbc4OAht7FZqzdwkjRMCXIM7O7gBtzUwsVhi3d1eoYRXpS OMvF/UUZ6GvgAc9sauUyhPIgdhU2pWNGGCOckTlYW8zk8ayPmJFE2kBGw7Y9JrO/3UEo Mvsvq91i/RHGgaUU8CfR4NNyMp2uwKt17RoAlFJ7huUQo4fSD6f2144A6TFa1gScfH+e 9VZjkItEVuziq4mStav3sA1DCgsVD75cMsoJ1FCAEr6/WL7s9An0qrzJLVrknVeOI9TT 3/Cg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=AlT0ghwcn8Hvf1ec07WcTUqn20TXd95Ai3B96QacZPY=; b=kIxXsgMbwZEqiRTxGBFwB1Dtu9RufZk73rcnTrZHz7NngTLzRCb5ud3Njg0w1WOjg7 JZXcn3AGBqD0kWaZbI5AVGZLuOwMiNzRnrMfql+lRu4ZMfVItWZT+saRtYzD1u0tyV+i FrywDJ84io9LR5mYWg4Uni6aathSbUFFyGbNXPCfLCQX6jQa9uXgXMDSU+n4vcv0MTVw ufLuJTx19oi5QgCUyPTxwoIeX5YBKKkXL/e5KKHhcCi4Um1a8LSyNprE55I6vLOvV7nP mvsGgVeEnNlqp2bneDrAsOrbqGb0JxNZI+m0GPf+JfIJvFS9qM8qYcb77pqD9t300Ih1 DsKA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXkrxyg4scXEsRVRKIX8l/Y+KwhGR5z6JB/5zIyZq7Ah3rvb6Qb YEftymeucFuya/AYS9Cqsifpoy7pxrErkA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwiVy12AoU+9WbwQ7RQvF7RcLUqh2RBvpwdaFo9t3XijDgB0HOcs3+VmJXHb7QOXSclvCIDIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:6901:: with SMTP id s1mr548640pgq.338.1569434065228; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [10.0.0.160] ([50.225.3.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e21sm220756pgm.7.2019.09.25.10.54.24 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_008B597D-D397-4277-BF48-40112E43557E" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Question on Picture Render Resolution Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:54:23 -0700 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <055E9CA5-0276-4BA1-8539-D46AD9879843@bonfirelabs.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) --Apple-Mail=_008B597D-D397-4277-BF48-40112E43557E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 When cameras are shooting photos or video they need to be very time = efficient with the compression. They need to process and save the file = on the device in a split second. AE and other tools can spend more time analyzing the image as it is = compressing it. Basically the phone / camera uses an acquisition format and AE = doesn=E2=80=99t. Phil Phil Spitler Creative Technologist t 415.394.8200 c 415.571.3139 = = = = > On Sep 21, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk = wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > This is curious to me, wonder if someone can elaborate. When I take = pictures with my phone which takes some pretty stunning pics (Galaxy = S10+), some pictures are very large size and file size like 8-10MB. >=20 > I will often take them and do some color editing in AE but when I = render, even at the same resolution, the file size is dramatically = smaller. >=20 > So, my question is, am I losing quality or are the renders simply more = efficient? >=20 > Thanks > Eric >=20 > --=20 > Eric D. Kirk | Kirk Productions > VFX for Kirk Productions > 443.206.1347 <> > www.kirkproductions.com > kirkproductions@gmail.com > YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/kirkeric = > IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ = > =20 --Apple-Mail=_008B597D-D397-4277-BF48-40112E43557E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 When = cameras are shooting photos or video they need to be very time efficient = with the compression. They need to process and save the file on the = device in a split second.

AE and other tools can spend more time analyzing the image as = it is compressing it.

Basically the phone / camera uses an acquisition format and = AE doesn=E2=80=99t.

Phil


3D"bonfire-logo"
Phil = Spitler  Creative = Technologist
t  415.394.8200  c  415.571.31393D""3D""3D""3D""



On Sep 21, 2019, at 9:34 AM, Mr. Eric D. Kirk <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Hello,

This= is curious to me, wonder if someone can elaborate.  When I take = pictures with my phone which takes some pretty stunning pics = (Galaxy S10+), some pictures are very large size and file size like = 8-10MB.

I will = often take them and do some color editing in AE but when I render, even = at the same resolution, the file size is dramatically smaller.

So, my question is, am I = losing quality or are the renders simply more efficient?

Thanks
Eric

--
Eric D. Kirk | Kirk = Productions
VFX for Kirk = Productions
443.206.1347
www.kirkproductions.com
kirkproductions@gmail.com
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/kirkeric
IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/
 

= --Apple-Mail=_008B597D-D397-4277-BF48-40112E43557E--