From: "Jim Curtis" Received: from sonic304-28.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.137.68.209] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7472001 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 23:01:16 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=flash.net; s=s2048; t=1574978473; bh=202bByKkt5TcokJaUq2aBfWx3trFzsMh1srmKdyjilU=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=lyxsoxHUmk+xSOBYBePyyEdDP3iC0xN4kzNW6cOqCA8QudKtn7PzE/1Aq/yquwivCgTryYNbzRqgIN6Tm4gYTDQFNGrDS6Kflf649m75YPcsUR/EQCioCVyTfl528J5uA1RAuqk8PaWYauHAKy3xGnNuRJo0X/7uRkb1hhnOWmZeLsWDZLXBRlSO/xMWwWqgxREmX7VlyCdlxOqaqlIk6nlUAiPMEHjT/22katTI5hGR+b3V2qTh8O+xTlChw7o5+qC7kz2xrLMcmkGO8PXBrT7J4fSAIWk4S6PAG6ZCQYZ49wQ37oI7qFEolEGWvDS8scrsQEaf0r6qWGMWCiHAeA== X-YMail-OSG: 25073CQVM1kJHmji47wEadYY6cFRLJIYPyLc1VQXWG86rgeyz02w8K_me4iUZ8r rUV3K1YKMSnqcWUYQUnLM2R4JjwGNbr6BC46rlnG5Q1a.5gJk9EIEUBmh31_QLM4HbcXll6jtQtM W7Cicgfb.WElJcTaTOjy4KrQfKubS3Fi0nqUTFRZYT7f_Fq.3JEHqctWISWW6R_0.vZIuVjlqoV3 sNEyiwSDQuFs9VvpMLHuwd5zL1CAn2v64N3VZQZ1Ey6dB8M.5j4rIRhXxtGLSzicDDLDBnXtTE2P Kc7KpAtMShms2sYbX4Y0qVvLMyfxDcrUyYib.HAc5diqCS9LT8Uy2xwln3sYB7MSzg1pf59bxaDs A2PlmcTNnW0jP6Uwdei2FwC8KInGg1lQr8d4wAPllAfm9DSb3Xs3Txwg7aa3R4uQSvMRIbFrSh61 RVzZjxgCNummyK6774y5nqujD_84DxPVsS.v4J8oXEB6OonYq.SmpddjxDnSF_lrPQ27tRW0mWJX 9WIT9vpKPEUo1VyxV83hWhKzRq1xkVfKTvcx6hreWG59LDw32y97HXTQBf4iQhYRiZeSFhV7mLkN opyLJmMtYyprzqG2zMKH5r.jQQnzVgAfBQGzLxRPNNzrYUsnaaTRcENVyAyMRk0UGtIDxOgcVbjz EMq2rP37Pwih790jXTJR9mOsQ0zJqVH_lslxwKueeEu6yfD74briShuPBAfn0V.D5WK0JxGde.La cZVkNE_50PCWwEkQF5fjhmqqZ0HAqloEpSOtd6tYx_9nNSopfFaDgzNy0yiB82VSwfFWIjzO7F4y x5oPZ.cfEaJ0EjqdYFzK_ZMbsmgqWH8xOBhqJE6JDWw1aKhmjneLC_qTDk3KONsVUkVjPbuBrgR9 _HdnGtqInaaMRsCH.DkEZ05S6kOxDeHWksiR4NNxbVGEyRwCCQlppVZ2CGQ61FjmMWCX.cxSuQVw CNHWMuC5chgVlTGAObwsRNNyWRco5sx1jh5tiLqcBM4rzMmgIVUAAlgD8.WowB715EvkuutDgFOC PF9VdGwc6cmkCtsHdHiZsquOEDe7t.NVM8fxd2_lXpNBbIFDplCjJUEnfqUC7XvR3KEgGNSmgPyD pWFZgZm1KJne6tMQJYtYpsyEqVhAbiQdg_HC0bBNxTAo1Gv5e2B601k_dFAe8J6ScqdwAehPBnQa h0KVic3Dy7oAFB4O.G9mOfwQP9ThQglky5nLxwICaJqYAUw1c3lgitJuOEHtq0LLQQ24ef24BwVB VL4PaY5dVo6fuix8k0.0kBD26GS0OT9d9hmBEf243I1u9grDnpmbh_gwLdTwux__T46fZRfayA_L MYsA9Fp6jyW21sdXI7srUX.5M42RvjojIvWrEUSEHE7jD266AV8qHFPRpZ6UOhnAxVHA.oDocLeo tOt0w3iSN5ikTRrPZaZJJqiePIFkZw7Edqi4- Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic304.consmr.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 22:01:13 +0000 Received: by smtp427.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID d80a9f8572ffd2e284c758fc08397499; Thu, 28 Nov 2019 22:01:12 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: [AE] PCIe 4.0 NVMe cache performance? Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2019 16:01:11 -0600 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <27F25AED-E8F7-4F25-8B23-4B541596F1EA@flash.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Content-Length: 2567 Speaking of rendering, Render Garden is on sale for $49 until 12/3 on = Toolfarm. It maxes out all the cores on my MacPro. Much faster than Ae = rendering on comps that are usually slow to render in Ae 2018.=20 Now, back to your regularly scheduled discussion. > On Nov 28, 2019, at 3:55 PM, Chris Zwar = wrote: >=20 > I doubt it, it=E2=80=99s really hard to benchmark properly. Even if = someone claimed they had, I would want really clear details on what = they=E2=80=99d done. >=20 > For example - even on the machine I=E2=80=99m using now, with AE 2020, = I=E2=80=99m 99% sure that rendering in the app is about twice as fast as = background rendering. I=E2=80=99ve done a few tests, flushed cache, = rebooted and done everything I can to try and make sure what I=E2=80=99m = seeing is repeatable. But it takes time to do properly, I=E2=80=99m = still not certain, and this is just on the same machine. It=E2=80=99s = much harder with different hardware. There are a lot of performance = benchmarks I=E2=80=99d love to try across different hardware but it = would take days of full-time work to really do it properly and I know I = don=E2=80=99t have the time or access to hardware! If anyone else = does, credit to them :-) >=20 > -Chris >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On 29 Nov 2019, at 2:57 am, Stephen van Vuuren = wrote: >>=20 >> I have not found any real meaningful differences in AE caching even = PCI vs SATA as other issues seem to drag it down. Has anyone = scientifically tested this? >>=20 >> -----Original Message----- >> From: After Effects Mail List =20 >> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 1:05 PM >> To: After Effects Mail List >> Subject: [AE] PCIe 4.0 NVMe cache performance? >>=20 >> Hey all, >> Have any of you done any testing on using a PCIe 4.0 NVMe drive as AE = Cache, particularly as it would compare to a PCIe 3.0 NVMe cache drive = within an After Effects/Premiere environment? >>=20 >> Theoretically, AE would be able to write cache files even faster to = the PCIe 4.0 disk, but I don=E2=80=99t know how that bears out in real = world performance. I=E2=80=99m speccing a 3950X build and pondering = this.=20 >>=20 >> carey >>=20 >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >>=20 >> +---End of message---+ >> To unsubscribe send any message to >=20 >=20 > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to