From: "Nick Fox-Gieg" <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Received: from mail-il1-f180.google.com ([209.85.166.180] verified)
  by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0)
  with ESMTPS id 7481940 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 15:45:26 +0100
Received: by mail-il1-f180.google.com with SMTP id t17so10485172ilm.13
        for <AE-List@media-motion.tv>; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:45:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=J856BICIB1osJKc61OdweFxmaYpvSUHLqtzMcH5gNN8=;
        b=NlgU6WmpsspbKoecPthYfqnqvnVjkMzoj4vMZPENrw4scLR7LNy6v4WREcOmViG8jQ
         2GY/VTliSAvmJq9TykKTy98EJAGSbpWOM0FPxQbcxnCXToJeDUFE7c78cGx0X+N9aJQ4
         SKCeQr0SM9KZE15rVGIGTE+KUD/UfdofYUAzparoqYmnlj9ES2632FfhuqSjMngBKSHM
         nXwriaZbDajdaQZ/3KiYyGrKjBR3IQrHgDPiHciK+EoEmTZpFxl7S+DF7LXbQZnn1S06
         oh8l6yEW/zARXa5lij+3ikSuB//f1ALRjnYieBQ2WyPBfXqJ2fQh35O49fqLOMiIQNBH
         vW3g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXIu6eMdzllf+tfG8jVLGyzDF+aRQHc/mk5N+bHeIKGfY1cOZ+M
	H5G0FphgeIRbjDJkWKtx0RlJ7Nk1cAHrsrWXP1lT1JqI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJOthYXHofZyTVtD3VGakzeyNApQSv+80YgjaHBbQCNSIfG0NWL4FZoeM1oZOUEGuDWOiJyJpMHR+t6vBrgPA=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d0c2:: with SMTP id y2mr16834470ila.184.1576939524579;
 Sat, 21 Dec 2019 06:45:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <list-7481922@media-motion.tv>
In-Reply-To: <list-7481922@media-motion.tv>
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 09:45:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJ27RHKpTAHKwst7w_5Rdtd=niAy3R_1z312_LxsXFKQL_xhCw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [AE] NVME for AE & PR editing
To: After Effects Mail List <AE-List@media-motion.tv>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000031e719059a37d856"

--00000000000031e719059a37d856
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Afaik speed will be ~5x greater, reliability should be about the same.

The only potential catch with nvme is whether it's taking PCI lanes away
from your GPU--generally not an issue except with multi-GPU setups and
lower-end motherboards.

Nick

On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 8:14 AM Evan Fotis Georgoulakis <
AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> wishing a happy holiday season!
>
> We are about to upgrade  an oldish pc, and a quick  look shows the
> prices of nvme-M.2 drives have dropped dramatically. Perhaps not of the
> top of the line 970 Evo & Pro ones but the "slower" cheaper QLC ones
> like Intel 660p & Crucial P1, which have reached the price of ordinary
> ssd drives that have more than 4x slower speeds (~ 100$ for 1TB drives).
>
> Would they be a better choice for PR & AE  for fast I/O read and write
> operations  than a regular ssd and if not why? Do they degrade faster
> over time are meant only for read operations?
> any caveat to make us prefer regular ssd's?
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
>
>
> +---End of message---+
> To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv>
>

--00000000000031e719059a37d856
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"auto">Afaik speed will be ~5x greater, reliability should be ab=
out the same.=C2=A0<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">The only p=
otential catch with nvme is whether it&#39;s taking PCI lanes away from you=
r GPU--generally not an issue except with multi-GPU setups and lower-end mo=
therboards.<div dir=3D"auto"><br></div><div dir=3D"auto">Nick</div></div></=
div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On=
 Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 8:14 AM Evan Fotis Georgoulakis &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:A=
E-List@media-motion.tv">AE-List@media-motion.tv</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><bl=
ockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #=
ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
wishing a happy holiday season!<br>
<br>
We are about to upgrade=C2=A0 an oldish pc, and a quick=C2=A0 look shows th=
e <br>
prices of nvme-M.2 drives have dropped dramatically. Perhaps not of the <br=
>
top of the line 970 Evo &amp; Pro ones but the &quot;slower&quot; cheaper Q=
LC ones <br>
like Intel 660p &amp; Crucial P1, which have reached the price of ordinary =
<br>
ssd drives that have more than 4x slower speeds (~ 100$ for 1TB drives).<br=
>
<br>
Would they be a better choice for PR &amp; AE=C2=A0 for fast I/O read and w=
rite <br>
operations=C2=A0 than a regular ssd and if not why? Do they degrade faster =
<br>
over time are meant only for read operations?<br>
any caveat to make us prefer regular ssd&#39;s?<br>
<br>
Thank you<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
+---End of message---+<br>
To unsubscribe send any message to &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:ae-list-off@media-=
motion.tv" target=3D"_blank" rel=3D"noreferrer">ae-list-off@media-motion.tv=
</a>&gt;<br>
</blockquote></div>

--00000000000031e719059a37d856--