From: "Greg Balint" Received: from mail-wm1-f47.google.com ([209.85.128.47] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7481950 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 16:17:41 +0100 Received: by mail-wm1-f47.google.com with SMTP id q9so11750161wmj.5 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 07:17:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=pZ2LYaGzTxd/lsgPl7c+4SKnbsca2P6jcmfLgy4zsYk=; b=tEo+CjPhUHi1mCg1kn0gwChMUg+DDyG8AjjTWNNkdnOTLzOtzih++cVOeVsPvqfhIf DLvX079hOr3p9L6SMB+GxjQlN4g+TyQpKTlvLHDy5RqkJUIK8UPCa0lzf+IqxJYY5PH/ WkzOr7qrewGf4x6PzJwGIKJVmzUmTGZHXRKaUekvvfpgZOZwz1hxST8EpSrDtKKjDTEi sngpSju9Sry2H/3vx4a+UBXx89M3+08BFgepkZGvlhru8ynwRFKzqjwSwN+PvIHWuVis mGDcClfJJO9iUOnETfyngQOwlP1bfrZx6XppkW1ELZ2M5pCIaQfL3GWdcXHfGBIcr5ah sWSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=pZ2LYaGzTxd/lsgPl7c+4SKnbsca2P6jcmfLgy4zsYk=; b=Z+0TDKhAqG9ljx64m/6gMV3gjaqNZM0LY7OgVNONAmGGTieiSgU9k+mDQwFfLyTXNB 7ZMqr8D1ZL8d3NWAgkR/hfTgEhl5GOY2ojXOvTdkswicmsojEfM5UKqis520auv8qR3d APUBCjSPRukVNRjUMwAyI9AD/BeUE65A2VrIrvla7ljHb4Cg80mQOsEpEcAEeCzTAAcq PyddAY2aOezTia3HrdBUp9G4jDwM3ZTXr3wAJUpAUyb202QmSaTu2/EuD9BWtj69xq/t 0aMfE9kJ5DptlD0TZpHr4wfIcY7C2bxU/MduUKLCUHZRvWsyqcSVvL4giLiSA+6V4vOx uf1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXlqD3BvcIRLY5sSOTk9JDUqE62zJ+N9DppHQnEpWSgGECN0jI3 ms3yJqPDLu+TMecc/wVs6qjd/DIzvbvi69k4n7vy/w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzypMg0SKOWHgIANYkwiXt5D8rcZdtNVxF0Jruip58GI+sJpxLzCvFa2qnvU1kjNsuKcNwlRb0HI13iT7PELBw= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:4144:: with SMTP id o65mr9225007wma.81.1576941461018; Sat, 21 Dec 2019 07:17:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 10:17:29 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [AE] Stupid question about baked in framerates on footage To: After Effects Mail List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009d9afb059a384b24" --0000000000009d9afb059a384b24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I did try that actually. It is nded up being all over the place, as the pattern was like a 12234445677 etc. No rhyme or reason other than both single extra frames and double extra frames dispersed throughout. Might have been something that was 23.976 then upped to 29.97, then up again to 30? I fear I may end up having to remake portions of the graphics. Gonna be sloppy and not ideal I think. ///Greg Balint //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer /321.514.4839 delRAZOR.com/ On Sat, Dec 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Jim Curtis wrote: > Have you tried stepping through the footage frame by frame in a section > with motion? This can reveal footage that was converted from 23.976 to > 29.97p, for example, by noting that the cadence is 12344, 12344... - ever= y > fourth frame repeated for one frame. That can give it a jerky look. > > I=E2=80=99ve encountered this several times. I put it in an NLE, and man= ually > remove every fourth frame. The result is a shorter clip, but at least it > smooths out the motion. > > Obviously, this would present problems with audio. But, you could take > address that with some time-remapping. > > > > > On Dec 21, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Greg Balint > wrote: > > > > Hey everyone, > > > > I have a video asset that a client provided me from a previous vendor > they had working on their videos. > > > > The only version they have is a 30fps clip of graphics and video that i= s > actually running at some lesser fps than 30. It stutters and jerks during > 30fps playback. I can't say it's 24fps or 23.976fps, but it's definitely > irregular when the frame pauses and doubles happen in the 30fps asset. > > > > I've tried the interpret footage dialogue and tried all the different > drop downs for the fps stuff but nothing seems to make this smooth. > > > > I know this seems like an amateurish question, but I can't figure out > what to do here. Any guidance would be appreciated. > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > ///Greg Balint > > //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer > > /321.514.4839 > > delRAZOR.com/ > > > +---End of message---+ > To unsubscribe send any message to > --0000000000009d9afb059a384b24 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I did try that actually. It is nded up being all ove= r the place, as the pattern was like a 12234445677 etc.=C2=A0 No rhyme=C2= =A0or reason other than both single extra frames and double extra frames di= spersed throughout. Might have been something that was 23.976 then upped to= 29.97, then up again to 30?=C2=A0=C2=A0

<= div dir=3D"auto">I fear I may end up having to remake portions of the graph= ics. Gonna be sloppy and not ideal I think.=C2=A0


///Greg Balint
//Art Director / M= otion Graphics Designer
/321.514.4839
delRAZOR.com/

On Sa= t, Dec 21, 2019, 9:55 AM Jim Curtis <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:
Have you tried stepping through the footage frame by frame in= a section with motion?=C2=A0 This can reveal footage that was converted fr= om 23.976 to 29.97p, for example, by noting that the cadence is 12344, 1234= 4... - every fourth frame repeated for one frame.=C2=A0 That can give it a = jerky look.

I=E2=80=99ve encountered this several times.=C2=A0 I put it in an NLE, and = manually remove every fourth frame.=C2=A0 The result is a shorter clip, but= at least it smooths out the motion.

Obviously, this would present problems with audio.=C2=A0 But, you could tak= e address that with some time-remapping.



> On Dec 21, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Greg Balint <AE-List@media-motion= .tv> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> I have a video asset that a client provided me from a previous vendor = they had working on their videos.
>
> The only version they have is a 30fps clip of graphics and video that = is actually running at some lesser fps than 30. It stutters and jerks durin= g 30fps playback. I can't say it's 24fps or 23.976fps, but it's= definitely irregular when the frame pauses and doubles happen in the 30fps= asset.
>
> I've tried the interpret footage dialogue and tried all the differ= ent drop downs for the fps stuff but nothing seems to make this smooth. >
> I know this seems like an amateurish question, but I can't figure = out what to do here. Any guidance would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> ///Greg Balint
> //Art Director / Motion Graphics Designer
> /321.514.4839
> delRAZOR.com/


+---End of message---+
To unsubscribe send any message to <ae-list-off@media-motion.tv= >
--0000000000009d9afb059a384b24--