From: "Chris Zwar" Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180] verified) by media-motion.tv (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.0) with ESMTPS id 7501794 for AE-List@media-motion.tv; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 02:40:13 +0100 Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id g3so3105092pgs.11 for ; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:40:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chriszwar-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=U8ecBi8EDuQJyGaByf9pEcFcVtK752U6KeisLwzNpzA=; b=ieJ3KHsm1kyMtGmtJ31y4Ryvw1uvyASGXOYya56qPg9iS+yZojvHQBNhefq6iQ+HC/ wXUD6CC4biLmFXUpd3kfqugZxVE8DuZGL6NXtNBOqCkJJmZOel89LwI0xg+GlY59xPqI RLlhvoXiU1LitkFtcj5U0X1zD8TXdjMS1OoWoSkBy6BTwqtqy2WI4KimwexrhaxsE4yA ypm1NuvwX/YxZDa6yuJI1odMbZqf29ReN9HU49Vl96SwMPrdsoiCB//EjUFJuxGKhNpk C/t8nlhujDopNkdddW0KiqhUbAHJkiSxU8ZHn9zP22rZiOcjzj6KwGDKn9ZpN9Bxa/wn 8vHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:date:references:to :in-reply-to:message-id; bh=U8ecBi8EDuQJyGaByf9pEcFcVtK752U6KeisLwzNpzA=; b=TjmYMtb4eXKiPre9g38o0JJe6q+HhXs3G5q2Ixpe11hoLJsZ9J8UE0bSqJ8zs58b/F 73hRtD8PHvBoDctZEXGUL77U73L8d56DkdDK2NHPX6ui8/oF+KhV0OBmxsrWhmk1iTD/ lJ6ZwIVmYYCUGoZFBRCppBWEnz7FHrwxXe8zN7onUOZzzHhRHAgh1T/i4Wp9VdC0+OOx k01RryGkro3sXHuTvfcS5D9y13VCOVTHkA2cXCYdpiKEl1TzmoKm/L9hMDv+xWJIHgdH BOBfXiOBY6J/UiQnqigf6HFJtC0d+fOrd9plzdYtg28T3iUIY2gMFVOySsNcVWa4YdE6 f/5w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUA0yxgGA0OHAt90E3syK3Ksy62q8Ijl6l8EOyzYonv/wZAlsP9 M4tYcusMyZuHpqAwfGYbqWN298/y7Ck= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyjJZLAICiT5LBKkfRTO1nkrGxoxFtk9JxFllJh+hjXyC6YNdJjMnwolwUrWRfp3IEA83LDtw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8815:: with SMTP id c21mr27244043pfo.81.1580780411004; Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:40:11 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([101.164.69.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r14sm21211819pfh.10.2020.02.03.17.40.09 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 03 Feb 2020 17:40:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B8B98669-279C-446F-9CD8-E516A37D88A9" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) Subject: Re: [AE] Keyframe smoothness Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 12:40:07 +1100 References: To: After Effects Mail List In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <41CF738B-3091-48B1-B611-536E3C764BF6@chriszwar.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) --Apple-Mail=_B8B98669-279C-446F-9CD8-E516A37D88A9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 BTW right-click on your keyframes and set them to =E2=80=9Ccontinuous = bezier" > On 4 Feb 2020, at 12:23 pm, Chris Zwar = wrote: >=20 > Just a few thoughts=E2=80=A6 what you want to do is use the graph = editor and set the view to speed. This will show you where things are = moving smoothly (smooth graphs) or not (pointy graphs). >=20 > If you=E2=80=99re animating position then it can help to separate = dimensions, so you can individually smooth out movement in each axis. >=20 > If you=E2=80=99re animating the position of an effect parameter and = you can=E2=80=99t seperate dimensions, then animate a null object = instead and then pick whip the effect to the null. >=20 > HTH, >=20 > -Chris >=20 >> On 4 Feb 2020, at 11:45 am, Mr. Eric D. Kirk > wrote: >>=20 >> Hello all, >>=20 >> This probably seems rudimentary but I seem to have always struggled = in trying to find the right way to smooth out keyframes. >>=20 >> Seems no matter what I use, easy easy, ease in, out, etc. It always = seems a bit choppy. Is there some advice out there on how to tackle = this? >>=20 >> Simple example would be animated a single line as if it were the wave = you'd see at a ball game. So every few frames the lines bends up then = back down. >>=20 >> Appreciate some insight. This has bugged me forever. >>=20 >> Eric >>=20 >> --=20 >> Eric D. Kirk | Kirk Productions >> VFX for Kirk Productions >> 443.206.1347 <> >> www.kirkproductions.com >> kirkproductions@gmail.com >> YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/kirkeric = >> IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3351363/ = >> =20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_B8B98669-279C-446F-9CD8-E516A37D88A9 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 BTW = right-click on your keyframes and set them to =E2=80=9Ccontinuous = bezier"

On 4 Feb 2020, at 12:23 pm, Chris Zwar <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Just a few thoughts=E2=80= =A6 what you want to do is use the graph editor and set the view to = speed. This will show you where things are moving smoothly (smooth = graphs) or not (pointy graphs).

If you=E2=80=99re animating position then it can help to = separate dimensions, so you can individually smooth out movement in each = axis.

If = you=E2=80=99re animating the position of an effect parameter and you = can=E2=80=99t seperate dimensions, then animate a null object instead = and then pick whip the effect to the null.

HTH,

-Chris

On 4 Feb = 2020, at 11:45 am, Mr. Eric D. Kirk <AE-List@media-motion.tv> wrote:

Hello all,

This probably seems rudimentary but I seem to have always = struggled in trying to find the right way to smooth out = keyframes.

Seems= no matter what I use, easy easy, ease in, out, etc.  It always = seems a bit choppy.  Is there some advice out there on how to = tackle this?

Simple example would be animated a single line as if it were = the wave you'd see at a ball game.  So every few frames the lines = bends up then back down.

Appreciate some insight.  This has bugged me = forever.

Eric


= --Apple-Mail=_B8B98669-279C-446F-9CD8-E516A37D88A9--